When it comes to the science surrounding climate change, there are two distinct camps saying opposing things about the current state of global weather patterns.
(Article cross-posted from Natural News)
On the one hand, you have climate fanatics who insist the world is “boiling” or “melting,” and that the only way to fix it is to ban everything that makes life in modern times livable. On the other hand, you have climate realists who admit that the climate has always been changing, and that there is no real climate emergency based on historical weather patterns.
Nobel Laureate Dr. John Clauser falls in the second camp, having recently affixed his signature to the World Climate Declaration stating that “there is no climate emergency.” Conversely, climate “apocalyptographer” Mike Mann holds a polar opposite position, claiming that every major weather event, including the recent Maui fires and Hurricane Hilary, is proof-positive that global warming is real.
Patriotic beachwear for freedom lovers! Shop now and get 10% off with code RB10. Vet & LEO-founded.
Both of these men cannot be right, of course. Only Clauser holds a solid position that aligns with science, while Mann holds the conspiratorial globalist view that every activity mankind does heats up the planet, thus causing the polar ice caps to melt and ocean levels to rise.
(Related: Check out these 14 U.S. cities that are planning to outlaw meat, dairy, private car ownership, new clothing, and commercial air travel by 2030.)
Going “green” means lowering regular people’s standard of living while allowing the rich to get richer
Clauser is hardly alone in rejecting the prevailing climate narrative. He is actually the second Nobel Laureate to sign the World Climate Declaration, a document that currently has nearly 1,600 prominent signatures.
Clauser also recently joined the board of directors of the CO2 Coalition, a climate organization that rejects the made-up notion that “greenhouse gases” like carbon dioxide are in any way responsible for directly causing major weather events that the “greenies” insist are occurring because too many people still eat meat and drive cars.
“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people,” Clauser is quoted as saying.
“Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.”
In no uncertain terms, Clauser has said again and again that, based on everything he knows and sees, there is absolutely no climate crisis taking place – at least not of a kind that humans can prevent, anyway.
“There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis,” Clauser does, however, say. “The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”
Clauser is quite brave in his position, sharing it publicly every change he gets, including at the recent Quantum Korea 2023 event. There, Clauser warned his audience that the pseudoscience and misinformation surrounding climate change continues to grow.
“Beware: If you’re doing good science, it may lead you into politically incorrect areas,” Clauser stated at the event.
“If you’re a good scientist, you will follow them. I have several I won’t have time to discuss, but I can confidently say there is no real climate crisis and that climate change does not cause extreme weather events.”
The man-made climate change hoax is a globalist plot to strip the world’s population of all freedom – because freedom is “polluting” the planet, we are told. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.
Sources for this article include:
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
There is no “Climate Crisis” —
In order for the Anthropogenic Global Warming theory to prove viable there must be the predicted and required subtropical “Hot Spot” observable in the upper atmosphere. Decades of testing with both balloons and satellites producing voluminous data points have proven there is no sign of a subtropical hot spot, thus there is no viable AGW theory.
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” – Albert Einstein
Testing for the “Hot Spot” is just such an experiment.
Likewise, the AGW theory requires that increases of “heat trapping ‘greenhouse’ gases” will necessarily cause rises of ambient temperatures, which in turn will produce an increase in atmospheric water vapor, itself the most prolific and therefore major “greenhouse gas,” thus multiplying the warming effects of the warming increases of the gases. Observations have shown no data correlating a rise in atmospheric water vapor with an increase in other “greenhouse gases,” as predicted and required by the theory apart from anomalous events such as the 2022 Tonga under-water volcano eruption. Theory once again fails critical verification test. Another theory on the scrape heap of history cobbled together like the bones of the Piltdown Man hoax, formerly the biggest scientific hoax of the past century.
All this goes to fortify my observation that “when people, including scientists & ‘experts,’ are paid to make a certain finding, they will find a way to keep finding what gets them paid.”
Speaking of greenie schemes to forestall climate change radical Leftist Alexander Cockburn in The Nation made the observation, “…vast sums of money will be uselessly spent on programs that won’t work against an enemy that doesn’t exist.”
He was prescient.
Stating the obvious, climate change has resulted in a greener earth, more flora and fauna, more arable land, more potable water, more people (~3.6B in 1970, ~7.8B in 2023), warmer temperatures more conducive to live on earth. What’s not to like? It’s stupid simple. “Climate change” is good for us. How obvious does it need to be?
CO2 HOAX easily explained even for liberals
If all the molecules of gases in the atmosphere was represented by a 10,000 seat stadium, only four seats would be occupied by CO2, up from three seats almost 200 years ago. And the human portion 3% (as per IPCC) is little more than noise.