Ken Ham: William Lane Craig Said the Unthinkable About Creation

In this Harbingers TV article, Ken Ham responds to William Lane Craig’s claim that young-earth creationism is comparable to belief in a flat earth.

• Ken Ham says William Lane Craig recently argued that believing in young-earth creationism is “just as bad” as believing the earth is flat.
• Ham calls the comparison unfounded and argues that young-earth creationism is rooted in a straightforward reading of Scripture, not anti-scientific fringe thinking.
• The dispute highlights a broader divide among Christians over whether Genesis should be interpreted according to plain biblical chronology or harmonized with mainstream old-earth scientific assumptions.
• Ham’s response centers on defending biblical authority, arguing that compromise on Genesis weakens confidence in the rest of Scripture.
• The article frames Craig’s statement as a serious and troubling dismissal of Christians who hold to six-day creation and a young earth.
• Ham’s position is that young-earth creationists are not rejecting evidence but interpreting evidence through the lens of God’s Word.
• The piece presents the creation debate as more than an academic disagreement, treating it as a battle over whether Scripture or secular assumptions set the terms.
• Harbingers TV categorizes the post under biblical truth and creation-related apologetics, featuring Ham’s response as a defense of Genesis.

Read the full story: https://harbingers.tv/ken-ham-william-lane-craig-said-the-unthinkable-about-creation/