In this FrontPage Magazine article, Mark Tapson argues that New York Democrats’ push to replace terms like “mother” and “father” in state law is part of a broader left-wing campaign to weaken the traditional family.
- Tapson frames the issue through a Marxist lens, arguing that the political left has long sought to undermine the nuclear family and shift authority over children toward the state.
- The article focuses on New York Senate Bill 9316, which would replace “mother” and “father” with “gestating parent” and “non-gestating parent” in portions of state law.
- The bill would also change related legal language, including replacing “paternity” proceedings with “parentage” proceedings and “putative father” with “alleged parent.”
- Supporters of the measure say the language is meant to reflect modern family arrangements, including adoptive parents and same-sex parents.
- Tapson rejects that justification, arguing that children need both a mother and a father and that adult desires should not be placed above children’s needs.
- He contends that the language change serves two purposes: erasing the distinct roles of motherhood and fatherhood, and normalizing transgender ideology around sex and reproduction.
- The article cites critics including Bruce Blakeman, State Sen. Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, and Rep. Claudia Tenney, who argue that New York Democrats are prioritizing progressive ideology over practical concerns facing families.
- Tapson closes by calling for conservatives to reject what he describes as a broader cultural agenda involving parental rights, gender ideology, drag queen story hours, pronoun mandates, men in women’s spaces, and Pride flags in classrooms.
Read the full story: https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-democrat-war-on-mothers-and-fathers/

