(DCNF)—Analysts at the investor advisory site Seeking Alpha published a piece on Tuesday in which they claim that Tesla could be facing what they call a “Blackberry moment” caused by a combination of political and market factors.
This article and the ongoing negative impacts on Tesla’s business fortunes are signs of just how much Elon Musk is sacrificing as he heads up the DOGE operation for the Trump administration.
- Gold SKYROCKETED during Trump’s first term and is poised to do it again. Find out how Genesis Precious Metals can help you secure your retirement with a proper self-directed IRA backed by physical precious metals.
The “Blackberry moment” analogy refers to the Blackberry communications device which dominated the personal handheld market for a decade until 2007, when Apple introduced the first iPhone. Blackberry, having failed to properly assess the market and to innovate to take advantage of evolving technologies, suffered an immediate, rapid decline from that moment forward.
I’ve been a critic of Tesla myself and am not a fan of electric vehicles in general due to their chronic limitations the industry has never successfully addressed despite having been in existence since the 1890s. Relevant to this analogy, I wrote a piece in 2023 in which I observed that Tesla body designs that seemed so innovative and even breathtaking a decade ago had become stale and were in need of updating. I still believe that to be the case.
I’ve also been a real critic of the Cybertruck’s exterior design, which is so radical that it without question limits its appeal to all but a small, wealthy subset of Americans who are far more interested in the virtue signal involved in owning one than in the real functionality of owning a pickup truck. Sales of the Cybertruck have been ok so far, but just ok, and seem destined to decline as the audience for them fades.
On the other hand, Tesla remains far and away the most successful U.S. electric vehicle maker, and, as Seeking Alpha points out, even after its recent decline in stock price still sports a market cap that exceeds that of the next 9 automakers combined.
That’s astonishing.
But Tesla’s current $766 billion market cap is a 50% decline from the company’s value just three months ago, and Seeking Alpha correctly points out that it is a pace of decline that is wholly unsustainable. Unfortunately for Tesla and Musk, the stagnating overall market for EVs in general means that a recovery is going to be hard to affect.
The Seeking Alpha authors conclude the piece with this assessment: “TSLA is a sell as protests and a collapse of brand image usher in an era of declining sales to be matched by a decline in investor sentiment.”
Oof.
The utter depravity of Democrat politicians, like Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, who this week gleefully encouraged the increasingly violent and obviously organized campaign against what is undeniably a great, uniquely American success story cannot be overstated. These and others who egg this campaign of domestic terrorism on should be ashamed and shunned by polite society.
Unfortunately, they are far from alone, and no Democrat elected official has overtly condemned the assault on Tesla to date.
Tesla was already struggling with market factors dictated by slipping demand for EVs in general before domestic terrorists began to mount this campaign against the company. Now, with the virtue signal aspect of its appeal in steep decline among America’s liberal class which has served as its main customer base, those problems have been multiplied.
So, is Tesla facing a real Blackberry moment? Here, it’s important to point out that that would require some innovative alternative EV company which incorporates new technologies that Musk and Tesla have failed to adopt.
If any such alternative exists today, it hasn’t been made apparent. In fact, most of Tesla’s U.S. competitors are either in bankruptcy or teetering on the brink. Plus, given the reality that the vast majority of real innovations in the EV space for more than a decade have been developed by Tesla itself, the rise of any such competitor anytime soon seems like a real pipe dream.
Tesla is definitely under siege and far from healthy right now, but rumors of its impending demise seem wildly overstated.\
David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
I will buy stock in whatever Elon Musk is doing. The robots are coming.
My next car will be a tesla.
2.5s to 60mph.
Running on electricity generated by clean coal.
Exploding liberal heads.
What else would you need to switch ?
How long a list would you like?
I just purchased Tesla stock for my grand children
It’s time for Elon musk to broaden Teslas appeal. Tesla needs to have a hybrid vehicle and not just electric vehicle’s. By having a hybrid vehicle, Tesla’s appeal will increase dramatically. Diehard Trump fans might even buy them!
EV’s were never about “protecting the environment”. It was always about proving yourself a responsible Karen. With their actions against Tesla, the left has proven it.
Don’t underestimate the genius of our great President Trump and Elon Musk to prevent this “Blackberry moment” from happening. They didn’t get to where they are by rolling over and playing dead.
It’s increasingly inaccurate to categorize it solely as an automaker. With significant investments in AI, robotics (e.g., Optimus), energy solutions, and software services like Full Self-Driving, Tesla operates more like a tech conglomerate. Its business model integrates multiple sectors, making it a pioneer in sustainable energy and autonomous technologies, not just electric vehicles. Ask Grok to list out all of the businesses the company either controls or has a significant stake in. It’s not an automaker any more!
Why yes, do everything when you can’t do anything well.
It’s hard to desire what you no longer want or believe in . . . hybrids and new alternatives are the best solution, agreed. Right now I see horrifying chemical fires and other concerns (long-distance traveling, unchecked terrorism, etc.) to be had at an inflated price. Pretty sure Trump AND Musk knew this was coming; DOGE and the remains of Twitter with some serious rocket science on the side should keep him plenty busy until the sales climate improves lol . . .
Musk’s factories are also busy producing tiny homes and spacecraft.
Well,, I will make my bet with Elon.. As soon as battery technology catches up with the needs of a traveler (500+ miles between charges) I will be happy to buy.
It’s so easy to be a loser, can of gas and a match.
I will bet on Elon..
Thanks.
Considering Global Warming is a total farce, it should be gone. The whole premise for EV’s is garbage. But look at the total garbage the rest of them are putting out. EV, or Gas. I think they’re all finished. Certainly Ford and Chrysler.
Daniel, your statement that “the whole premise for EV’s is garbage” is total nonsense. While human-caused global warming is a farce and a lie, there is so much to love about electric vehicles, Teslas in particular. Clean air is very nice to have (I grew up in the horrible LA smog). Electric motors have much more torque and efficiency than gas or diesel (that’s why they are used in locomotives). There is almost no maintenance on a Tesla (I know this because I have driven two of them for a total of 140,000 miles). Imagine the insane maintenance expense on a performance gasoline car or hybrid that can even come close to the performance of a Tesla performance model. Also, the weakest link–the batteries–will still last 300,000 miles or more if they are not abused by over or undercharging. I doubt that a gasoline-powered vehicle wouldn’t need a new engine and/or transmission by that mileage. And the technology is amazing and fun. Tesla’s over the air software updates add improvements and new features and make an older model feel like it is new. The technology in a 6-year old Tesla far surpasses that in any other current vehicle. And the full-self driving (supervised) feature is getting incredibly good. It is a huge fatigue-reducer on long trips, and will soon be able to take over at a level that is far safer than a human driver, without supervision. The bottom line is that, if you use a Tesla for a daily commute and charge at home, you will be able to drive 200 miles for less than $6.00 in electricity (in a state that has decent electricity rates), and you will NEVER have to stop for fuel. On a long trip, Tesla has thousands of superchargers that will get you back on the road in less time than it takes to order and eat fast food (fast food and other restaurants are available near most of the chargers).
We might as well be more specific than referring to it as a “campaign of domestic terrorism”. It is likely exclusively a DEMOCRAT campaign of domestic terrorism. Just because liberal media refuses to admit that 20 blacks beat up a white person (referring to them only as “youths” or “teens”) doesn’t mean we can’t use descriptive labels.
I’m no fan of EVs, for the stated reasons here, and for the demand they will place on the grid.
But after decrying the rhetoric of the Dems against Tesla, it turns out you have no specific idea for how Tesla will be suddenly eclipsed? Or even, really, any vague idea? There doesn’t seem to be any basis for this piece but fear.
All that said, I wouldn’t go near Tesla stock, but that’s for my earlier reasons. Much of the EV craze is a mandated bubble in my view.