(Natural News)—A new report has estimated that COVID-19 vaccines averaged one death for every 800 injections around the world across all age groups.
This is according to statistical analysis of mortality data from a range of Southern Hemisphere and equatorial countries. It was carried out by Correlation Research in the Public Interest, which is based in Canada, under the leadership of University of Ottawa Lead Scientist Dr. Denis Rancourt. The researchers estimated that around 17 million people died following the rollout of the vaccine, and with 13.5 billion injections provided during the study period, it averages out to 1 death for every 800 doses.
If you take this one step further and consider the 677 million doses that were administered in America, it would mean that nearly 850,000 Americans died from the jab. However, the researchers concede the average could be lower in the U.S. because the study’s focus on the Southern Hemisphere meant that there were more people involved who received the Astra Zeneca injections that later proved to be toxic and were withdrawn.
However, the 1 in 800 figure is just an average; the risk of fatal toxicity per injection rose dramatically with age. As a result, the researchers recommended that governments “immediately end the baseless public health policy of prioritizing elderly residents for injection with COVID-19 vaccines, until valid risk-benefit analyses are made.”
Among the 17 countries spanning four continents studied were Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, Brazil, Colombia and Argentina. Taken together, the nations studied represent just over 9 percent of the world’s population and over 10 percent of global vaccinations.
The paper shows reports, analysis and graphs demonstrating a temporal relationship between the vaccines and spikes in mortality from all causes in each nation. It is important to note that more than half of the countries they studied did not have a detectable rise in all-cause mortality following the World Health Organization’s global pandemic declaration in March of 2020; it was only when the vaccines and boosters were rolled out that things took a turn for the worst.
The researchers said that after their previous research showed an association between all-cause mortality spikes and mass vaccination in the U.S., Canada, Israel, Australia and India, they decided to look at other countries for which similar data was available to determine if they experienced the same type of synchronicity.
Excess mortality is a term for the number of deaths recorded due to all causes during a crisis that goes beyond the number of deaths seen in a given place at that time of year under normal conditions.
To control for factors such as seasonality to allow of the fact that deaths from problems such as respiratory illness generally peak during the winter months, they confined their research to countries that lack seasonal fluctuations, such as equatorial counties, and those whose vaccines were rolled out in summer.
Excess mortality didn’t rise until after vaccine rollouts
Interestingly, the paper reported that nine out of the 17 countries examined did not experience detectable excess mortality in the year between the time the pandemic was announced and that country’s first vaccine rollout. In other words, Philippines, Singapore, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, Uruguay, Paraguay and Thailand only saw excess mortality after their vaccines were rolled out.
The authors believe that the evidence they gathered points to a causal link between the jabs and high mortality rates, citing adverse event monitoring, studies exploring vaccine-induced pathologies, payouts from vaccine injury compensation programs, and autopsy studies.
They also discounted some common “alternative explanations” that have been put forth by those who can’t accept the link between vaccines and mortality, such as the changes being due to heat waves, conflicts, earthquakes and the emergence of Covid variants.
They stated: “If vaccines prevented transmission, infection or serious illness, then there should be decreases in mortality following vaccine rollouts, not increases, as in every observed elderly age group subjected to rapid booster rollouts.”
Sound off about this article on the End Medical Tyranny Substack.
Sources for this article include:
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
Certainly covid can kill so the question is whether the unvaccinated cohort dies of covid versus the vaccinated cohort dying of covid + vaccine.
Which cohort has less mortality?
AND can we tell a covid death from a vaccine death?
Wow, Thank You.
There could be a latency period while the vaccine is doing it’s majik. If that is the case, the number would change dramatically were the resulting carditis injuries reported properly, i.e., no problem existed prior to the jab. Ambiguity cannot be tolerated in the numbers which makes them fantasy. Interesting nonetheless.