(Natural News)—Months before the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “pandemic” was officially announced to the world in early 2020, scientists in China were working on a synthetically engineered “SARS-CoV” bioweapon with an altered spike protein, newly uncovered records show.
Making the “lab leak (theory) almost certain,” the documents in question, which were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, contain the blueprints for developing these engineered “spike proteins,” the job of which was to infect human cells and become “inserted into SARS-Covid backbones.”
All of this took place at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) starting in December 2018. About a year later, the first “cases” of COVID injection were reported in China, followed by more cases in the United States and beyond.
It was in late 2019 when the “pandemic” started to become a global event, and none of it would have been possible apart from U.S. government funding that was funneled into EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit organization that for many years has funded bioweapons development and experimentation.
“The documents also show how EcoHealth tried to deliberately mislead the Pentagon on how risky the experiments were to secure funding,” tweeted Sen. Gerard Rennick (Queensland, Australia).
“The team sought to synthesize spike proteins with furin cleavage sites that had been designed to bind to human receptors more easily … The furin has been one of the focal points of debate about Covid-19’s origin, with some experts claiming it could only have been acquired through lab experiments.”
(Related: Check out what EcoHealth Alliance whistleblower Dr. Andrew Huff had to say to Mike Adams about DARPA’s involvement in the creation of deadly bioweapons in Wuhan, China.)
EcoHealth plays dumb
The proposed blueprint in question was ultimately denied by the United States Department of Defense (DoD), but what it contains was still used as a blueprint elsewhere for how to create the bioweapon that would ultimately be dubbed “COVID-19.”
The same document exposes EcoHealth for deliberately trying to mislead the Pentagon as to just how risky the experiments proposed within in it really were. This deception is how EcoHealth secured U.S. taxpayer funding for the later creation of COVID.
EcoHealth has since responded to the allegations by calling them “incomplete” and “false.” The nonprofit insists that all of this is “based on misunderstanding of edits and comments on the document, and based on misleading out-of-context quotations and a lack of understanding the process by which federal grants are awarded.”
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) disagrees. A longtime vocal supporter of the lab leak theory, Paul says the unearthed documents reinforce the “deception” that was used by EcoHealth and other key players directly tied to the Wuhan lab that allegedly unleashed the bioweapon.
“This latest [document] leak makes the case for a lab leak almost certain,” said Matt Ridley, a biologist and science writer who has written extensively about the lab leak theory.
“A reckless experiment, known at the time to be reckless, probably caused the death of millions of people. Scientists and the media conspired to conceal the evidence. Let that sink in.”
U.S. Right to Know is once again credited with uncovering the documents. Said documents outline the nature of the grant proposal, which was called “Project DEFUSE: Defeating the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses.” The entire thing talks about the deliberate engineering of high-risk coronaviruses that are capable of spilling over from animals to humans – and that is exactly what appears to have happened with the deliberate engineering and “leak” of COVID from the Wuhan lab.
Learn more about the latest COVID revelations coming to light at Plague.info.
Sources for this article include:
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
Yah, brah, guess Daszak, who graduated from the bottom of his 200th rated college really struggled to “convince” the DoD of this when DARPA, MITRE and Ralph Baric held a forum on biohacking coronaviruses back in 2005!
Gosh how I despise all this q–clownish “smoking gun” “they are terrified” and “silver bullet”!?