In this Breitbart article, Breitbart News summarizes Peter Schweizer and Eric Eggers’ argument that California’s election system has been legally structured in ways that make fraud easier to commit and harder to detect.
- The article frames California’s slow vote-counting process as intentional rather than accidental, arguing that the state’s laws have made elections lengthy, opaque, and difficult to audit.
- Schweizer asks whether election fraud is still fraud if the law itself permits practices that allegedly enable it.
- The piece points to California’s still-unofficial June 2026 primary results for governor and Los Angeles mayor as evidence of a system that delays final outcomes and frustrates voters.
- Schweizer and Eggers trace the alleged problems back to 2011, when California approved online voter registration through SB 397.
- They argue that later reforms expanded vulnerabilities, including allowing non-citizens to serve as poll workers, issuing driver’s licenses to illegal aliens, lowering voter pre-registration to age 16, and centralizing vote counting at county facilities.
- The article criticizes universal vote-by-mail, lax ballot-curing standards, and California’s lack of voter ID requirements as policies that reduce election security.
- It also highlights California’s legalization of ballot harvesting in 2016, arguing that allowing third parties to collect unlimited ballots creates major opportunities for abuse.
- The article cites examples involving homeless voter registrations in Los Angeles and allegations of political operatives offering incentives to get people registered.
- Schweizer concludes that California has created an election system that “can easily be exploited,” while Eggers argues that the system is a “disgrace” by design rather than by incompetence.
Read the full story: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/06/10/peter-schweizer-is-it-still-election-fraud-when-its-legal/
At last, a conservative news aggregator that does not bow to the woke right.
