(Just The News)−A growing number of energy companies are looking to nuclear recycling as a way to address waste management concerns while strengthening domestic fuel supply.
Ed McGinnis, the former assistant secretary for the Office of Nuclear Energy told the Joint Natural Resources and & Environment committee that by recycling spent nuclear fuel, the United States can dramatically reduce waste, increase energy security, and create high-paying jobs.
McGinnis is also the CEO of Curio, a nuclear technology firm, and has partnered with major U.S. utilities to explore the feasibility of recycling the massive stockpile of spent nuclear fuel currently sitting in storage. According to McGinnis, this process could reduce waste volumes to just 3% to 4% of the original material while extracting valuable resources.
Curio hopes to help revive America’s nuclear energy capacity with its recycling process. By reprocessing spent uranium fuel, the company can extract plutonium, which McGinnis touts as a superior energy source due to its higher power density and reduced weight requirements.
“You can get a reactor that’s a third the size of a uranium-based reactor,” McGinnis said, adding that without recycling, plutonium remains locked within spent fuel and inaccessible for future energy production.
A major impediment to nuclear cost-effectiveness is the current waste model. Nuclear waste is stored onsite and is managed by utilities, like Entergy, and doesn’t leave any room for recycling and can be a ratepayer burden.
U.S. nuclear power plants store their spent fuel by first cooling it in pools for several years before transferring it to reinforced concrete dry casks. These casks, sitting on storage pads near reactors, were meant to be temporary until the federal government retrieved the waste — a process that was supposed to start in 1997 but never materialized.
“That is what triggered the lawsuits by utilities to recoup taxpayers’ money,” McGinnis said.
Jody Montelaro, Entergy’s vice president of public affairs, said that the U.S. Department of Energy is currently reimbursing Entergy for the storage costs. Curio aims to change the current process by recycling spent fuel, extracting valuable materials, and reducing waste to just 3% to 4% of its original volume, which McGinnis says the federal government could handle much easier.
While McGinnis acknowledged that federal regulations remain a challenge, he added that there is “a lane to go forward” and are already working with utilities. The main hurdles are state and local approvals, as well as public communication to ensure communities understand the benefits.
“This is not your grandfather’s reactor,” McGinnis said. “These are state-of-the-art, environmentally friendly, and economically robust solutions.”
Curio’s proposed facilities, expected to be operational within five to seven years, are projected to generate over 3,000 jobs, the majority of which will be trade-based positions with salaries ranging from $80,000 to $140,000 per year.
“These are generational jobs,” McGinnis emphasized.
The facility is estimated to generate more than $400 million annually in direct tax revenue, further contributing to local economies. Notably, Curio has pledged not to seek Louisiana’s Industrial Tax Exemption Program, a tax exemption offered to most large-scale industrial projects.
Beyond job creation and waste reduction, McGinnis highlights Curio’s partnerships with four national laboratories and industry leaders such as Orano, the world’s largest nuclear recycler. Orano, which operates major recycling facilities in France, has designated Curio as its lead recycling partner in the U.S.
The U.S. is largely reliant on foreign-supplied nuclear fuel, with major sources including Russia, Canada and Kazakhstan, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. EIA notes that the U.S. has nuclear fuel production capacity insufficient for domestic needs, with domestic mining now accounting for about 5% of the fuel used in U.S. reactors.
Louisiana, home to one of the nation’s largest and oldest nuclear fleets, stands to benefit significantly from Curio’s model. The state’s existing infrastructure, transportation corridors, and workforce make it a strong candidate for future nuclear investment.
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
