SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Discern Report
Discern Report
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Discern Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Style News

New FBI Documents Reveal Would-Be Trump Assassin Thomas Crooks Exchanged Emails with Butler County Sheriff’s Deputy

by Morgan G. Murphy
June 7, 2026
in News, Original
Thomas Crooks
He reigns. We pour. Promised Grounds is the Christian coffee company that happens to also offer the best coffee available.

Two years after Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, fresh details from heavily redacted FBI records continue to expose troubling gaps in what the public has been told about the near-murder of President Trump. Judicial Watch’s successful FOIA lawsuit has forced the release of documents showing that Crooks emailed a deputy with the Butler County Sheriff’s Office prior to the July 13, 2024, attack.

The revelation, buried in 48 pages of materials turned over by the FBI, describes an exchange between the would-be assassin and a female deputy. According to the interview summary, the deputy only discovered the emails after a New York Times reporter contacted her in the aftermath of the shooting. She reportedly did not recognize Crooks when his face flooded the news and confirmed no personal interaction beyond the two emails, which concerned a redacted subject.

Buy physical precious metals before the next gold and silver surge. Don’t buy numismatics! Buy pure bullion instead. Whether with cash or retirement funds, learn how we can help you prepare for financial turbulence ahead.

This latest disclosure arrives amid persistent questions about how a 20-year-old with no apparent high-level connections managed to position himself on a rooftop with a clear line of sight to the then-presidential candidate. Law enforcement had eyes on Crooks well before shots rang out, yet systemic failures allowed him to fire eight rounds, killing Corey Comperatore and injuring others while grazing Trump’s ear.

The presence of any pre-event communication between Crooks and local authorities—however innocuous it may later prove—demands unredacted answers rather than bureaucratic stonewalling.

The documents also mention a “gray remote device” with an antenna recovered from Crooks’ pocket, adding another layer of intrigue to an investigation that has too often felt engineered to obscure rather than illuminate. A medic’s account from the scene further underscores the chaotic response, with body-handling protocols and canine alerts that highlight how close the entire security apparatus came to catastrophic breakdown.

One cannot help but note the irony. While federal agencies spent years fixating on phantom threats from parents at school boards and traditional Catholics, a determined gunman with encrypted devices and prior contact with local law enforcement nearly succeeded in altering the course of American history.

The same institutions that lecture endlessly about “threat assessment” somehow missed—or failed to act on—multiple red flags leading up to Butler.

Calls for full transparency have only grown louder. The American people deserve to know the content of those emails, the identity of every official involved in the security planning, and whether any connections existed that might explain Crooks’ movements and capabilities. Partial releases and heavy redactions serve no legitimate investigative purpose at this stage; they fuel legitimate suspicion of a cover-up designed to protect institutional reputations rather than pursue truth.

President Trump’s survival that day was nothing short of providential. In the face of evil intent and apparent institutional negligence, divine protection prevailed—yet we must not presume upon such mercy while allowing incompetence or corruption to fester unchecked.

The Butler assassination attempt exposed deep vulnerabilities in our nation’s leadership protection protocols. Two years later, with fresh evidence of pre-event contact between the shooter and local authorities, the public’s right to know remains unfulfilled. Full disclosure is not optional; it is essential to restoring confidence that those charged with safeguarding our republic can actually do so.

Anything less dishonors the memory of Corey Comperatore and the providential sparing of President Trump.

Show Hours





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

Tags: LedePoliceStickyThomas CrooksTop Story
Next Post
Breitbart

The Hidden Trump Boom: Data Reveals American Economy Thriving

  • About Us
  • America First Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Integrating With Augusta Precious Metals
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Site Operated By JD Rucker.

© 2023 America First Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Original
  • Curated
  • Aggregated
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 America First Report.