Editor’s Note: Dr. Naomi Wolf has become one of the leading figures exposing the truth about the Covid-19 “vaccines.” She came from an unexpected source; as a liberal, she’s among the small group of people from the political left who have crossed over to play in the mostly conservative realm of Covid jab opposition.
On today’s episode of The JD Rucker Show, I talked about the story below from Natural News that highlights bombshell claims echoed by Dr. Wolf. Here’s the original article…
Daily Clout CEO Naomi Wolf described Pfizer’s mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine as a war against women and human fertility.
She explained that the mRNA shot was supposed to address a respiratory infection. However, it resulted in many women suffering horrible things in their reproductive systems and their children experiencing vaccine injuries.
“To me it says that this is a war against women,” Wolf said. “It’s a war against women’s fertility, women’s ability to nurse, women’s ability to carry and deliver live babies. And they knew it, they ruined women,” Wolf said.
She pointed her fingers at government health agencies along with the medical establishment for pushing pregnant women to get the vaccine. These people, alongside those who were aware of the vaccine’s danger on fertility, should be held accountable.
In particular, she cited Report 38 – a document penned by orthopedic surgeon Dr. Robert Chandler that came out in August 2022. The report, which was scrutinized by a team from the Daily Clout and “Bannon’s War Room,” found that 923,194 women – 72 percent of the total female vaccine trial participants – suffered from vaccine injuries. Of this number, 16 percent were reproductive disorders.
“The Pfizer document analysis reports that women are hurt more than men. And it really leads you to wonder if this mRNA injection is kind of a war against women. It certainly is a war against human fertility,” Wolf said.
Moreover, the author and former political advisor mentioned Chandler’s finding that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the COVID-19 vaccine spread throughout the body within 48 hours. The LNPs accumulate in various organs, such as the brain, spleen, liver and ovaries. (Related: Pfizer knew its mRNA vaccine for covid “leaked into ovaries” but covered it all up.)
Earlier, Wolf had issued warnings about the 13 to 19 percent drop in live births worldwide – especially in Western Europe and North America, which used the mRNA vaccines.
Pfizer director raises red flags about vaccine’s effect on fertility
Even Pfizer executive Jordon Trishton Walker admitted that the mRNA injections are negatively impacting fertility.
The Pfizer director of research and development expressed his concerns during an undercover interview: “The vaccine shouldn’t be interfering with [menstrual cycles], so we don’t really know. There is something irregular about the menstrual cycles, so people will have to investigate that down the line,” Walker said.
“I hope we don’t find out that somehow this mRNA lingers in the body … because it has to be affecting something hormonal to impact menstrual cycles.”
Wolf pointed out that the “industrial fat” LNPs building up in the ovaries block the fallopian tube and cause agonizing and terrible harm to menstruating women. She added that vaccinated women suffered menstrual damage in more ways than one.
Wolf mentioned that she was the first American reporter to call attention to signals from women whose menstrual cycles were harmed by the COVID mRNA vaccine. She also said the Daily Clout had broken stories showing how the mRNA injections damage women’s reproductive system and human reproduction in general.
Follow VaccineInjuryNews.com for more about the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine harming women’s fertility.
Watch Naomi Wolf expound on the horrors of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine on human fertility below.
This video is from the What is happening channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- Naomi Wolf: Pfizer FULLY AWARE of the dangers of its mRNA COVID vaccine.
- Naomi Wolf: Pfizer, government know vaccines won’t cure COVID-19… but they push them anyway.
- Ben Armstrong: Pfizer knows the COVID vaccine is dangerous for pregnant women.
- Pfizer, government regulators hid smoking gun data showing that covid jabs cause birth defects and infertility.
- On hidden camera, Pfizer director expressed concern about covid jab-induced menstrual irregularities; “the scandal would be enormous.”
Sources include:
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
