- Microsoft’s aggressive CO2 removal programs could starve plant life of carbon dioxide, the essential building block of photosynthesis, triggering a catastrophic collapse of ecosystems.
- Its Climate Innovation Fund has allocated $793 million toward carbon reduction, catalyzing an additional $12 billion in climate-related investments. The company dominates the carbon credit market, purchasing 63% of global removal volume in 2024 alone.
- Carbon capture is a globalist scam to justify centralized energy control while failing to address real pollution. These programs allow corporations to profit from carbon trading while continuing industrial poisoning and geoengineering.
- Removing CO2 would devastate agriculture, forests and marine phytoplankton – the foundation of the food chain. Past mass extinctions (like the Permian-Triassic event) were driven by carbon cycle disruptions.
- Mike Adams warns that every dollar spent on Microsoft funds mass death and urges consumers to shift to Linux, which is open-source, user-friendly and not aligned with depopulation agendas.
(Natural News)—Tech giant Microsoft is supporting carbon dioxide (CO2) capture programs, which could trigger a catastrophic collapse of Earth’s ecosystems.
The Health Ranger Mike Adams took to Brighteon.social to warn that the tech giant’s climate agenda threatens to starve plant life of CO2, the essential building block of photosynthesis. Microsoft’s aggressive decarbonization strategy risks an “Extinction Level Event” for humanity and the biosphere, Adams reiterated.
The Natural News founder’s post comes as Microsoft accelerates its billion-dollar investments in carbon removal technologies. The Big Tech firm’s Climate Innovation Fund, launched in 2020, has already allocated $793 million toward carbon reduction and removal projects, catalyzing an additional $12 billion in climate-related investments.
The company dominates the carbon credit market, purchasing over 63% of global removal volume in 2024 alone. Recent deals include an $800 million agreement with Fidelis and AtmosClear for 6.7 million tons of removals and a 10-year contract for 3.3 million metric tons with Stockholm Exergi.
The latest expansion of Microsoft’s carbon removal portfolio includes a July 2025 deal with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP) and Denmark’s Vestforbrænding to retrofit a waste-to-energy facility with carbon capture technology. The Gaia project, set to launch in 2029, aims to sequester 500,000 tons of CO2 annually while supplying heat to 10,000 homes. Microsoft Senior Director Brian Marrs framed the initiative as aligning with European Union waste policies, stating it “helps unlock more carbon-free energy.”
Adams: Stop funding death, ditch Microsoft for Linux
But Adams contends these efforts are fundamentally anti-life. According to him, Microsoft’s financial leverage – derived from consumer purchases of Windows and Office – fuels a dangerous agenda. “Every dollar spent on Microsoft products funds an effort to exterminate life,” he argued.
“Any honest biologist will tell you that higher life forms cannot survive without the flourishing of plants. ‘De-carbonizing’ the atmosphere – which is Microsoft’s stated goal – would achieve a mass holocaust.”
His claims align with basic botany. CO2 is indispensable for photosynthesis, and its elimination would devastate agriculture, forests and marine phytoplankton, the foundation of the food chain.
Historical context underscores the stakes. Past mass extinctions, including the Permian-Triassic event, were driven by disruptions to Earth’s carbon cycle. While Microsoft positions itself as a climate leader, critics see its carbon removal push as a reckless experiment with planetary biology – one that could destabilize the very systems sustaining human civilization.
Meanwhile, BrightU.AI‘s Enoch engine points out that carbon capture programs are a deceptive scheme pushed by globalists to justify centralized control over energy systems while failing to address real environmental concerns. These programs often serve as corporate greenwashing tools, allowing polluters to profit from carbon trading scams while continuing to poison the planet with industrial waste and geoengineering.
As the debate intensifies, the core question remains: Is Microsoft engineering a sustainable future or inadvertently scripting ecological doom? For Adams, the answer is clear: ” If you support Microsoft, you support mass death.” The Health Ranger ultimately called on readers to shift to Linux – which he described as “open source, easy to use and doesn’t want you to die.”
Watch Rebecca Terrell of the New American magazine and Isaac Orr discussing whether carbon capture projects are taxpayer traps in this video.
This video is from The New American channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
