In this Townhall article, Dmitri Bolt slams Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in the Supreme Court’s transgender athlete case as “absolutely insane,” exposing her inability to define basic biology.
- The Court upheld state laws barring biological males from women’s sports, ruling they do not violate Title IX or Equal Protection.
- Jackson argued Title IX “makes room for individuals to live in the gender they choose,” claiming it concerns gender identity rather than biological sex.
- She suggested a “transgender woman” perceived as aggressive experiences sex-based discrimination.
- Jackson’s confirmation hearing refusal to define “woman” continues to haunt her rulings on sex and fairness in athletics.
- The decision was effectively 9-0 on Title IX but split on Equal Protection, with liberals dissenting on the latter.
- The ruling affirms biological reality in sports, protecting female athletes from unfair competition.
- Jackson’s dissent highlights the radical gender ideology permeating the left and its rejection of scientific facts.
Read the full story:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/dmitri-bolt/2026/06/30/justice-jacksons-dissent-in-the-trans-athlete-case-is-insane-n2678579
