At last, a conservative news aggregator that does not bow to the woke right.
In this American Thinker article, John Green questions whether Joe Biden’s autopen-signed pardons, including blanket immunity for Anthony Fauci, are constitutionally bulletproof without evidence they reflected the president’s actual will.
- Thousands of pardons were issued near Biden’s exit, many via autopen machine mimicking his signature, with no recordings, logs, or affidavits confirming his direct orders.
- The Hunter Biden pardon was hand-signed, suggesting Biden prioritized it while others may have been issued by bureaucrats without his knowledge.
- Trump declared many autopen pardons invalid, but none of the released criminals have been re-arrested pending adjudication.
- The article raises two key constitutional questions: Can Article II pardon power grant total preemptive immunity for any crime, and is a pardon valid without proof it represents the president’s intent?
- Fauci’s blanket autopen pardon for potential crimes over ten years is highlighted as a test case, given new documents implicating him in gain-of-function research, cover-ups, and perjury.
- The Supreme Court may need to rule, with potential outcomes involving foreign extradition if U.S. pardons fail to shield high-profile figures like Fauci.
- Autopen use raises serious concerns about vesting constitutional power in machines rather than the elected president.
Read the full story:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/how_bulletproof_are_joe_biden_s_pardons.html
