SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Discern Report
Discern Report
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Discern Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Type Curated

Ending Birthright Citizenship Heating Up to Be One of Biggest Legal Battles of Trump’s Administration

by Virginia Allen
February 5, 2025
in Curated, Opinions
Birthright Citizenship
Discern Report

(Daily Signal)—Legal experts are debating the interpretation of the 14th Amendment inside and outside of courtrooms this week.

The amendment has often been interpreted to mean anyone born in the United States is automatically a U.S. citizen, and yet its interpretation may not be that simple, according to Kurt Lash, professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

“Often called the birthright citizenship clause, this text actually requires more than birth to become a national citizen,” Lash said during a debate on the subject sponsored by The Federalist Society on Tuesday.

“One must also be born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,” Lash, who is also a contributor to The Federalist Society, continued. “The meaning of that second requirement remains a subject of significant debate, in particular whether it applies to persons born to noncitizen parents illegally in the United States or to noncitizen parents only temporarily in the country.”

Lash moderated the debate on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment just two weeks after President Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring the end of birthright citizenship to children born to illegal aliens.

The 14th Amendment declares that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s executive order focuses on the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” and holds that those born to parents who are not in the U.S. legally are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction and are therefore not legal citizens.

The amendment “does not include the U.S.-born children of travelers just passing through or temporarily residing here who otherwise claimed no allegiance to the nation, to our government, because that child at the time is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,” Amy Swearer, a senior legal policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation, said.


  • The Great Gold Scam, Explained


Swearer argued there is a great deal of room to debate the 14th Amendment and pointed out that legal scholars have done so for years.

John Yoo, a professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley, disagrees with Swearer and argues that the “traditional reading” of the amendment is the “correct” one.

The Trump administration’s recent interpretation of the amendment has triggered multiple lawsuits, including lawsuits from 22 state attorneys general and the American Civil Liberties Union.

In January, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour temporarily blocked Trump’s executive order until Feb. 6. This week, multiple hearings are scheduled to consider the order, which, if not blocked again, will take effect on Feb. 19.

On Thursday, Coughenour will consider whether to issue a preliminary injunction that would further prevent the Trump administration from enforcing the executive order. And on Friday, a hearing will be held to consider a lawsuit brought by 18 states challenging the order, according to ABC News.

Meanwhile, on Monday, 18 House GOP members led by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, signed a 23-page friend-of-the-court brief backing Trump’s executive order to end automatic birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens.

Given the significant legal implications and controversy over Trump’s order, many speculate that the case, or cases, will eventually get to the Supreme Court for the nine justices to finally clarify the meaning of the 14th Amendment.






Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare

In today’s uncertain world, where skyrocketing medical costs and bureaucratic red tape threaten the very fabric of the American way of life, protecting your family’s health and financial future has never been more critical. Medical bills remain the leading cause of bankruptcy in the U.S., with millions of hardworking Americans either uninsured, underinsured, or overburdened by premiums that don’t deliver real value. But what if there was a way to secure top-tier coverage that aligns with your conservative values, saves you money, and gives you peace of mind?

Enter America First Healthcare—a private insurance agency dedicated to empowering freedom-loving patriots like you to reclaim control over your healthcare destiny.

Founded by Jordan Sarmiento, a dynamic entrepreneur and former touring musician who knows firsthand the highs and lows of navigating America’s complex insurance landscape, America First Healthcare stands as a beacon for those who believe in small government, personal responsibility, and the enduring American Dream. Jordan’s own journey underscores the company’s mission: after a harrowing six-day hospital stay that racked up a $95,000 bill, his Conservative Care Coverage through America First Healthcare reduced his out-of-pocket expenses to just $500. This isn’t just insurance—it’s a shield against the financial pitfalls that plague so many families, ensuring you’re prepared for life’s unexpected turns without sacrificing your principles.

At its core, America First Healthcare is about more than policies; it’s about shared values. In an era where “woke” policies and liberal ideologies seem to infiltrate every corner of society, this agency prioritizes serving conservatives who value freedom and self-reliance. They offer a suite of essential services designed to fortify your life, including:

  • Health Insurance: Tailored plans that keep your family healthy and ready to thrive, addressing the gaps that leave 41 million Americans vulnerable to preventable chronic diseases and inadequate coverage.
  • Life Insurance: Protection that secures your loved ones’ future, ensuring your legacy endures.
  • Business Insurance: Safeguards for your enterprise, preserving the income that fuels your independence.

What sets America First Healthcare apart is their commitment to personalization and savings. Start with their complimentary Free Insurance Review, where experts evaluate your current policies to uncover hidden gaps, eliminate over insurance, and potentially slash your costs by up to 20%. Whether you’re among the 27 million uninsured, the 44% underinsured on marketplace plans, or the 33% feeling squeezed by high premiums, their team crafts customized solutions that deliver better coverage at rates that respect your wallet. And with ongoing support from advisors who share your worldview, you’ll never feel alone in the fight for affordable, reliable protection.

Clients rave about the difference America First makes. Families across the nation have switched to better health insurance for less, resting easy knowing they’ve partnered with a company that puts America first. As one satisfied customer might say, it’s not just about policies—it’s about preserving the freedoms that make this country great.

Don’t let liberal overreach or financial uncertainty derail your dreams. Take the first step toward unbreakable security today by visiting for your Free Insurance Review. With America First Healthcare, you’re not just insured—you’re empowered to live the life you deserve. Act now, because your American Dream is worth protecting.

Tags: Daily SignalImmigrationLedeTop Story
Next Post
The Atlantic Tries Looking at Origins of 'Gun Crime'

The Atlantic Tries Looking at Origins of 'Gun Crime'

Comments 1

  1. Fred T Adams says:
    1 year ago

    This is a wonderful point on which to debate forcefully through the next 4 years. Providing the Republicans don’t spend more effort than they must. Ponder this: if no birth tourists are able to come to America, the number of “birthright citizens” being made will fall to zero. Seems like it will be a relatively simple task to so constrain entry, without ever saying a word about “birthright citizenry”. I hope the legal determination will ultimately deny it. But either way, as President Trump continues to teach us, there is more than one way to skin a cat. And if the dems choose this as the hill to die on, that choice will divert resources from other debate.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Us
  • America First Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Integrating With Augusta Precious Metals
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Site Operated By JD Rucker.

© 2023 America First Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Original
  • Curated
  • Aggregated
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 America First Report.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?