- Democrats and the media relentlessly condemned Nicolás Maduro as a brutal dictator for years, blaming him for Venezuela’s collapse and massive refugee crisis, and demanded his removal during Trump’s first term.
- Once President Trump orchestrated Maduro’s arrest by U.S. law enforcement (with military support) in New York on drug and weapons charges, the same critics suddenly flipped, calling it an illegal “invasion” and claiming it violates the law without congressional approval.
- Prominent Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Chris Murphy, and Chris Van Hollen previously criticized Trump for not ousting Maduro, but now denounce the successful action as dangerous, unrelated to U.S. security, and motivated by oil industry and Wall Street interests.
- Paid protesters who recently marched in “No Kings” rallies labeling Trump a dictator are now demanding Maduro’s release, creating rich irony by defending a real dictator while attacking the one who removed him.
- The Biden-Harris administration previously offered a $25 million bounty for information leading to Maduro’s arrest, yet now claims Trump’s action doesn’t make America safer.
- This pattern of hypocrisy extends to other issues, like Bernie Sanders praising Danish-style policies in theory but demanding RFK Jr.’s resignation when implemented under Trump.
- Media figures like Rachel Maddow once warned against thinking strongmen like Maduro could be removed, but now criticize Trump for actually doing it.
- The reactions confirm deep-seated Trump Derangement Syndrome: even positive outcomes like removing a tyrant are twisted into negatives if Trump is responsible.
- Only a few outliers, like Sen. John Fetterman, admit it’s a good development that Maduro is gone.
- Democrats’ “situational outrage” and flip-flops expose them as the “clown party,” prioritizing partisanship over American interests and reality.
Read the full story: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/01/dictators_are_bad_unless_trump_stops_them.html
