(Natural News)—A Court of Appeals in North Carolina has set a precedent for the forced vaccination of all children with a controversial ruling involving a 14-year-old boy who was given a COVID-19 vaccine without his consent or that of his parents.
The court ruled unanimously that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) preempted a state law that could have protected the minor, Tanner Smith.
The problem began when Smith, who is a student at Western Guilford High School in Greensboro, was informed that he had been exposed to COVID-19 at school. In a letter to his parents, the school district said that he could not return to football practice until he had been given clearance by a public health professional unless he got tested for the virus. The letter added that a local school would be holding a free clinic offering COVID-19 tests and that consent for the tests would be required.
Patriotic beachwear for freedom lovers! Shop now and get 10% off with code RB10. Vet & LEO-founded.
The next day, Smith went with his stepfather to the clinic to take advantage of the free testing because he was eager to resume football practice. However, it turned out that the school was also holding a free vaccination clinic alongside the testing. With his stepfather waiting in the car, Smith filled out a form that he assumed was related to the testing he was instructed to undergo. A clinic worker reportedly attempted to contact his mother, who was not available, but they did not try to reach his stepfather.
Although Smith insisted to the workers at the clinic that he was there to receive a test and not the vaccine and made it clear he did not want to be vaccinated, a clinic worker reportedly said “give it to him anyway.” He ended up receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine over his protests and without obtaining parental consent.
Smith and his mother, Emily Happel, sued their school district, along with the vaccine clinic, for violating Tanner’s bodily autonomy, his mother’s constitutional liberty and parental rights, both parties’ federal constitutional rights and battery. When a trial court dismissed this complaint on the grounds that the PREP Act shielded the defendants, they appealed the decision.
Unfortunately, the appeals court has affirmed the original decision by the trial court and said that even though North Carolina state law does require healthcare providers to get written consent from parents or legal guardians before giving minors vaccines with emergency use authorization that have not been fully approved by the FDA, the court maintains that the PREP Act preempts this state law, although it acknowledged that Tanner suffered due to the “egregious conduct” of being given the shot against his wishes.
The PREP Act can be used to allow forced vaccination
The PREP Act took effect in 2005, and it provides immunity from liability and lawsuits to parties carrying out “countermeasures” recommended by the Secretary of Health and Human Services that are used in a declared public health emergency. It also covers manufacturers and distributors of countermeasures such as vaccines.
In other words, it doesn’t matter at all that Smith did not want the vaccine and his parents did not consent to it; the PREP Act’s broad protections mean that they can do whatever they want. As the court noted, “Wisely or not, the plain language of the PREP Act includes claims of battery and violations of state constitutional rights within the scope of its immunity, and it therefore shields Defendants from liability for Plaintiffs’ claims.”
This sets a dangerous precedent and means that no one will be held accountable for forcibly giving children vaccines under the guise of a health emergency.
Sources for this article include:
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Sick bastards..
It’s also not against the law to shoot someone trying to attack you and cause bodily harm with drugs in a needle either..
you’re gonna need to be real serious about this when you come…
Take it to the SCOTUS! We the people have the right to say no. This is WAR!
You have to go after the PREP act. That is the ONLY way to get the law stricken.
SPEAK UP OR LOSE YOUR FREEDOMS.
It’s just that simple
I’m not religious by any means, but if Satan is real, he is working through these “workers” who knowingly give the shot because it’s all about the money. They are evil, pure and simple.
oh, he is real alright….hopefully you will find out before it is too late
The PREP act does not trump the Constitution. Appeal it please. We cannot afford to let this stand. They cannot deprive us of the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Yes, I know, Declaration of Independence too. They can ostracize you but they cannot forcefully modify your body without your permission.
Can they pass a law that condones rape? That is exactly what they perpetrated against this young man, with a needle probably larger than most of the little dicks in Washington that passed this crap. If he has after effects from the death jab, do they face murder charges?
THIS VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT! Disbar the “Judge”
Sue the snot out of these evil SOB’s
The NC appeals court has given Americans the tools needed to stop D.C. tyranny. Any person involved in any way with the medical “profession” can now inject every bureaucrat and politico with any “vaccine” they want. The PREP act protects them.
All great comments now who exactly is going to financially start and support a gofundme account to assist whom ever has the grounds to file this? It’s easy to make all kinds of powerful statements. However, it takes real courage to come along side in assist. Those who you compellingTo take this action!