SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Discern Report
Discern Report
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Discern Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Type Aggregated

Clarence Thomas Slams Supreme Court for Rejecting Pro-Life Free Speech Case

by Townhall
February 26, 2025
in Aggregated, News
Clarence Thomas
Retarded? Apparently, many on the “woke right” have gone full-retard with their anti-MAGA rhetoric. For REAL news, opinions, and videos that aren’t retarded, check out the fastest growing conservative and Christian news aggregator!

Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas expressed strong criticism after the highest court declined to hear a case involving pro-life activists and their free speech rights. In a rare public statement, Thomas condemned the decision, arguing that the Court’s refusal to consider the case undermines fundamental First Amendment protections. The case in question involved activists challenging restrictions on their ability to express anti-abortion views, a matter Thomas believes the Court should have addressed to safeguard free speech amid increasing government regulations.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear two cases involving pro-life groups who challenged laws banning protests near abortion clinics. The Court rejected appeals from Coalition Life, or the “America’s Largest Professional Sidewalk Counseling Organization,” in New Jersey and Illinois. Both had appealed lower court rulings that dismissed their lawsuits. They argued that “buffer zones,” which were set in place after a previous Supreme Court decision in Colorado, keep patients from facing harassment. Thomas criticized the law, which was grounded in the 2000 Hill v. Colorado decision that upheld a similar law based on a “right to avoid unwelcome speech” under specific circumstances.


  • How to Prepare for Food Emergencies if You Don’t Have a Homestead or Bunker


In a dissent, Thomas said he “would have taken this opportunity to explicitly overrule Hill.”

“For now, we leave lower courts to sort out what, if anything, is left of Hill’s reasoning, all while constitutional rights hang in the balance,” Thomas wrote.

He argued that the Supreme Court mistakenly treated the Hill case differently from other First Amendment cases because of its abortion context, stating, “Hill’s abortion exceptionalism turned the First Amendment upside down.” […]

— Read More: townhall.com



  • Hand-curated links from conservative and Christian sites — NO legacy media garbage links. Patriots get their news every day at JDRucker.com


Advisor Bullion Surge

Tags: StickyTop Story
Next Post
Democrats’ Resistance to MAGA Runs Into an Echo Chamber Wall

Americans Give Trump a Big Thumbs Up and Deliver Crushing News to Democrats in New Poll

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Us
  • America First Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Integrating With Augusta Precious Metals
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Site Operated By JD Rucker.

© 2023 America First Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Original
  • Curated
  • Aggregated
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 America First Report.

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?