(Natural News)—Canadian economist Prof. Michel Chossudovsky discussed with Mike Adams during a recent episode of the “Health Ranger Report” how the U.S. Empire is run by arrogant and bullying leaders who do not consider the consequences of nuclear war – let alone understand history and geopolitics – making it seem that they are not aware of the limits and danger of their own power.
Chossudovsky, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Ottawa and president and director of the Centre for Research on Globalization, pointed out during the show how the “decision-makers” are brainwashing the public into believing their narrative. “The problem is that the decision-makers are necessarily specialists in nuclear war. They create and believe in their own propaganda. Decision-makers are also victims of their own propaganda,” the expert on geopolitical, economic, and public health analysis around the world said.
“I’ve been doing research on nuclear weapons for more than 20 years. But what struck me was this Nuclear Posture Review under the Bush administration published in 2002, where public opinion was led to believe that nuclear weapons, particularly the so-called mini-nukes, were harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion was underground,” he disclosed and added, with a disclaimer that he is quoting Pentagon documents. According to the Department of Defense (DOD), the Nuclear Posture Review is a legislatively mandated review that establishes U.S. nuclear policy, strategy, capabilities, and force posture for the next five to ten years.
He analogized what happened to a pack of cigarettes and the government would say, “Smoking is good for your health.” They changed the label and they said, “This bomb is good for your health, go ahead and use it.” “That was entrenched in the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review. At the same time, it recategorized nuclear weapons so that they could be used in the conventional war theater. They did not require the permission of the commander-in-chief, it could be a three-star general-approved. Now that, I think, is the beginning of this whole process,” he recalled.
Adams agreed adding that this put the country in very dangerous waters. Meanwhile, the host mentioned a recent military exercise being conducted that could launch a nuclear conflict – Operation Sea Breeze by the U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, which ran from Sept 11 to 15 in Constanta, Romania. “This is a land and sea-based exercise with multinational Allies and Partners, aimed to enhance the capabilities of the Black Sea and Partnership for Peace maritime security forces while progressively training and preparing the Ukraine Maritime Command staff,” the U.S. Navy website wrote.
“This [Sea Breeze exercises] could be used as a cover story to plant or to detonate a nuclear weapon,” Adams warned and also cited the Baltic Sea operations, which was used as a reason to plant the explosives that blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.
“It was civilian infrastructure target that has devastated the industrial economies of Germany and other European, and Western European nations,” the Natural News and Brighteon founder said. “This is something that the U.S. has done before. And I’m very concerned that they may do it again.”
Chossudovsky concurred pointing out that the United States has invested in a $1.3 trillion nuclear weapons program, which “goes into the pockets of the military-industrial complex.” And not only that, he also emphasized the fact that nuclear weapons are already on the table and they’re not something which are there as a weapon of last resort. Thus, he said, any incident in the Black Sea, resulting from the exercise and deployment of military hardware, could lead to a false flag and trigger World War three. (Related: Nuclear war escalation alert – Urgent interview with Steve Quayle.)
U.S. is willing to commit suicide just to incite WWIII with Russia
Elsewhere in the show, Adams and Chossudovsky talked about acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and her role in triggering an imminent war with the Russians. “In my opinion, she is one of the most dangerous figures in the history of the United States of America. And she has ethnic hatred toward people of Russian, ethnicity or descent. She seeks the total destruction of an entire ethnic group. Her obvious hatred is allowed to run amok across U.S. foreign policy,” the Health Ranger noted. “This kind of thing leads me to believe that out of sheer desperation to destroy Russia, the U.S. is willing to set off a nuclear weapon against its own naval vessels, in a Pearl Harbor-like incident, to gain public support for full engagement with Russia in World War Three.”
For the professor, Nuland has an instrument of their powerful entities behind her, which stay in the shadows. But for him, removing Nuland will not change things. “Nuland is in Africa but she’s all over the place as far as regime change is concerned. I read that Secretary General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg made a statement a few months back, saying very textually the war started in 2014. Now, everybody says it’s the Russians that started it in February 2022. But then he said, ‘No, it didn’t start. It’s there,'” the professor said citing an interview of the NATO head with the Washington Post.
He also explained that looking at the start of the war in 2014, Noland was there, associated very closely with the “Nazi parties,” which showed that there was a neo-Nazi agenda embedded in U.S. foreign policy. “And when I look at the project of the New American Century, it also has certain doctrine behind it when they said we are going to wage a long war and a whole series of theater wars and will also modernize a weapons system. But the thing is, those wars are simultaneous. Nuland must have been also involved because her husband was one of the authors of this project.”
Visit NuclearWar.news for stories related to the impending nuclear war being waged by the U.S. government. Watch the”Health Ranger Report” episode featuring Michel Chossudovsky below.
This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
