Editor’s Commentary: Arguably the hardest part about drinking daily from the firehose of news is that some big stories get missed. Usually if they’re big enough we see them reported again and again within a news cycle by multiple conservative and alternative media outlets, but there’s one major exception. When it comes to the truth about the Covid-19 “vaccines,” the truth is often buried indefinitely because it’s a taboo topic for far too many of the “good guys” in media.
Case-in-point: This blockbuster study that was released just before Christmas revealing extremely important evidence that could be used to prevent people from continuing their destructive regimen of “vaccine” booster shots. The Gateway Pundit dropped a story about it, but even with their massive reach the story did not get the attention it deserves. This story needs to be amplified far and wide because it’s likely the vast majority of Americans who are still getting booster shots have no idea they’re actually increasing their risk of getting Covid.
Even as the truth about the jabs continues to trickle out, we’re faced with the dilemma of self-censorship by most of the major conservative and alternative news outlets. As has been revealed in the last few drops of the Twitter Files, Big Tech is censoring Covid “vaccine” data. This is why the topic is anathema with most major right-leaning news outlets. They aren’t willing to risk being ripped off the Big Tech teats. Google and YouTube are by far the most lucrative advertising mediums that pay these outlets. Facebook is by far the biggest driver of traffic. Getting blacklisted by Big Tech could be devastating to the Daily Wires or Breitbarts of the world, so they just avoid the Topic-That-Must-Not-Be-Discussed.
I don’t necessarily hold it against them. They are paying salaries and are the source of income for families. As a news outlet that refuses to be beholden to Big Tech, it’s easy for us to point fingers without acknowledging the repercussions. We feel the heat every day as our own revenue is a drop in the bucket compared to what conservatives outlets that play ball with the vaxx-narrative are making. That’s why we appreciate whatever we can get in the form of generous donations. With that said, here’s Ethan Huff from Natural News reporting on this important topic…
Every time a person gets injected with a covid “vaccine” or “booster,” his or her risk of testing “positive” for covid and later getting sick or dying increases substantially, according to a new study from the Cleveland Clinic.
The paper appeared on the pre-print server medRxiv, showing that getting “vaccinated” and “boosted” for covid with mRNA (messenger RNA) chemicals makes a person more – not less – prone to succumbing to injury or death.
The highest risk, unsurprisingly, exists in those who get three or more injections as opposed to just the first two or three.
“The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected,” wrote the study’s authors, who include Nabin K. Shrestha, Patrick C. Burke, Amy S. Nowacki, James F. Simon, Amanda Hagen, and Steven M. Gordon.
For their research, the aforementioned looked at 51,011 Cleveland Clinic workers – the institution is massive – to see how well the new so-called “bivalent” mRNA injection is performing.
We are told that only 21 percent of the group’s 51,011 employee base took the bivalent shot, which was deemed to have an effectiveness rate of just 30 percent. Overall, five percent of all workers in the study contracted covid during the 13-week analysis period.
“Protection provided by vaccination (analyzed as a time-dependent covariate) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression,” the study’s abstract explains. “The analysis was adjusted for the pandemic phase when the last prior COVID-19 episode occurred, and the number of prior vaccine doses received.”
Among the 51,011 employees evaluated, 41 percent had at least one previously documented case of covid while 83 percent had received at least two doses of a covid injection.
“In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated state was independently associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, .70; 95% C.I., .61-.80), leading to an estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 30% (95% CI, 20-39%),” the study further explains.
“Compared to last exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 90 days, last exposure 6-9 months previously was associated with twice the risk of COVID-19, and last exposure 9-12 months previously with 3.5 times the risk.”
All in all, it was determined that the shots do not work as claimed. None of them seem to prevent infection, and many of the people who take them end up getting sick or dying. So much for “safe and effective.” (Related: Remember in 2014 when the Cleveland Clinic started using Traditional Chinese Medicine [TCM] to treat patients?)
Cleveland Clinic adds disclaimer to study about it not being “peer reviewed” – because the results defy the official narrative
The fact that medRxiv even allowed this new study to appear on its pre-print server at all is a feat in and of itself, considering the platform has a new policy against studies that contradict the official story about covid “vaccines.”
Perhaps the paper was allowed because the Cleveland Clinic included a special disclaimer that calls into question its own findings. It reads:
“This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.”
The suggestion, of course, is that peer review is an essential component of “valid” science, even though it is an inherently corrupt and worthless process that is not what the scientific community has made it out to be.
“So, NOW is it fair to say these are NOT ‘vaccines’ in any sense of the word???” asked a commenter in response to these latest scientific revelations.
“How many professionals, like Dr. Malone, did Twitter and Facebook censor for saying this early on?” responded another.
The latest news about covid injections can be found at Genocide.news.
Sources for this article include:
Why One Survival Food Company Shines Above the Rest
Let’s be real. “Prepper Food” or “Survival Food” is generally awful. The vast majority of companies that push their cans, bags, or buckets desperately hope that their customers never try them and stick them in the closet or pantry instead. Why? Because if the first time they try them is after the crap hits the fan, they’ll be too shaken to call and complain about the quality.
It’s true. Most long-term storage food is made with the cheapest possible ingredients with limited taste and even less nutritional value. This is why they tout calories so much. Sure, they provide calories but does anyone really want to go into the apocalypse with food their family can’t stand?
This is what prompted the Llewellyns to launch Heaven’s Harvest. They bought survival food from multiple companies and determined they couldn’t imagine being stuck in an extended emergency with such low-quality food. They quickly discovered that freeze drying food for long-term storage doesn’t have to mean sacrificing flavor, consistency, or nutrition.
Their ingredients are all-American. In fact, they’re locally sourced and all-natural! This allows their products to be the highest quality on the market, so good that their customers often break open a bag in a pinch to eat because they want to, not just because they have to due to an emergency.
At Heaven’s Harvest, their only focus is amazing food. They don’t sell bugout bags, solar chargers, or multitools. They have one mission – feeding Americans in times of crisis.
What they DO offer is the ability for people to thrive in times of greatest need. On top of long-term storage food, they offer seeds to help Americans for the truly long-term. They want them to grow their own food if possible which is why they offer only Heirloom, Non-GMO, Non-Hybrid, Open-Pollinated seeds so their customers can build permanent food security on their own property.
