The Federal Bureau of Investigations is not the national law enforcement agency that most Americans believe it to be. It is a Deep State strongarming group that views American citizens as the enemy. They do the bidding of the globalist elites, protecting politicians and organizations who align with their agenda while going after anyone they see as a threat to that agenda.
Some say they are purely supportive of Democrats, but this is not completely accurate. They’re aligned with the Deep State’s agenda, and while 9 times out of 10 that means Democrats, there are many Republicans (well, RINOs) who are also under the protective wing of the FBI. Their true enemy is not the GOP but America First patriots, most of whom happen to be in the GOP.
RINOs generally get a pass from the FBI.
It is time to enact a plan to disband the FBI. Some may argue that we should reform the organization but I believe the rot is too well-developed to make reforms practical. We can fill any gaps in law enforcement with a combination of U.S. Marshals and interstate cooperation between local law enforcement agencies. Today’s police and sheriff’s departments often have the technological sophistication to put them on par with the FBI, a status that was not common just a couple of decades ago.
On today’s episode of The JD Rucker Show, I was joined by my wife to discuss several stories pointing to the need to get rid of the FBI. That video and show notes are below, but first I wanted to list seven reasons I believe it is time to disband the FBI for good. We’ve seen nothing but bad news from them in recent years. I don’t recall the last major bust they had that actually protected American citizens. Instead, their actions have been working against Americans, just as Ron Paul declared over three decades ago.
- Zero Transparency in Affidavit: This is the last straw in my book. Their unwillingness to explain their actions to a very interested public with yesterday’s ridiculously redacted affidavit demonstrates they don’t just hate us. They also lack any respect for us.
- Mar-a-Lago Raid: This was the last straw for many other Americans. They raided a former president for a “crime” that has been committed by every president in modern history. Donald Trump’s “crime” was far less concerning to national security than what the past three presidents at the very least have done. Also, knowing that they raided Donald Trump before Hunter Biden is an absolute joke.
- Gretchen Whitmer Fednapping: Entrapment is a very serious offense, yet Americans are being prosecuted for acting on the prompting of the FBI. We have to ask ourselves if the men who planned to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer would have made such plans if the FBI never infiltrated them.
- January 6th: We now know that dozens of agents and operatives participated in prompting attendees of the mostly peaceful process to enter the Capitol Building. This, perhaps more than anything else, tells us their true targets are not criminals but America First patriots.
- Hunter Biden’s Laptop: The FBI had the laptop from hell in 2019. They didn’t just ignore it. They willfully and aggressively covered it up. This makes one wonder if the Deep State and the powers-that-be had plans for Joe Biden to be installed long before the first Democrat primary. Otherwise, why wouldn’t they have just let Joe go down for Hunter’s many offenses and then pick someone else to install? Then, there are the recent revelations that the FBI ordered Big Tech companies and likely corporate media to suppress the laptop story when it broke a month before the 2020 election.
- Russiagate: Many articles and a few books have been written about the massive malfeasance committed by multiple FBI agents to manufacture the Russiagate hoax. That particular piece of work demonstrated corruption from bottom to top, leading me to my conclusion that they simply cannot be reformed.
- Hillary Clinton Let Off: It’s funny how in the affidavit they list the numbers of confidential, secret, and top secret documents they got from Mar-a-Lago. The reason it’s funny is because it’s reminiscent of what James Comey said about Hillary Clinton’s emails when he declared he was letting her off the hook. Being locked away at Mar-a-Lago is exponentially more secure than Clinton blasting sensitive documents out through an unsecured email server. None of what they took from Mar-a-Lago has ever been seen by foreign agents, while EVERYTHING Clinton sent out was likely intercepted one way or another.
There are good FBI agents. We know this because of the dozens of whistleblowers coming forward now. But the bad greatly outweighs the good within the bureau so anything positive they’ve done in recent years is moot. To say the FBI should be kept because they occasionally do good work is like defending Nazis because they built roads. The evil is far greater than the good.
Here’s today’s show.
Here are my show notes:
- What Released Affidavit Reveals About FBI’s Mar-a-Lago Raid
- To Help Biden, FBI Interfered With 2020 Election
- FBI Targeting Project Veritas Over Ashley Biden’s Diary
- New Poll Reveals Just How Much Damage FBI Sustained in Public Trust After Raid on Trump
- FBI’s Former Intel Chief on Raid of Trump Home: ‘I Think They Are Going to Regret This’
Leave a comment for this story on our new Substack.
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
On point 7, the difference was the FBI’s assumption of intent. Clinton was assumed to have no ill intent. Trump is assumed to have ill intent. Most likely for no other reason than one’s a democrat and the other’s a republican.
When laws are unspecific, with much of their enforcement left to law enforcement’s discretion, as if they have the ability to read minds, those laws are guaranteed to be abused. The espionage act is a perfect example. The individual must have “reason to believe,” which is purely subjective. The sad truth of the matter is that assumed intent is basically written into the law. Congress basically handed the DOJ and FBI a license to abuse. And you can’t hold them accountable for it. All they have to say is that they genuinely believed the individual had ill intent. You can’t prove they didn’t genuinely believe there was ill intent, any more than they can prove the ill intent. At that point it’s little more than a contest to see which mind reader will the judge believe. Congress could fix a lot of the problem by not creating massive, generic, obfuscated laws that delegate their responsibility to the discretion of other agencies, unnecessarily leaving large openings for the prospect of abuse. That’s a significant part of the problem.
Another huge gaping hole is Congress’ failure to enact law that can feasibly be equally applied. The law may be very specific, but can it realistically be equally and fairly applied. Equal protection sounds nice, it should naturally limit discretion, and it is a great goal, but the application of it must be realistically feasible. If laws cannot be realistically equally applied, then the corrupt individuals can just say, “Well, we’re doing our best. We got a few, but not all,” when the reality is that those few they prosecuted were specifically targeted. They’ve got an easy out.
You have to take away the leeway to abuse. Take away the excuses. Take away plausible deniability. Remove the room for it, and so on, as much as possible. There are many things congress could do to address the problem. But it’s important to remember that even if we did abolish the FBI, the huge gaping holes for abuse that currently exist in the law could and would still be utilized.