In this FrontPage Magazine article, Daniel Greenfield argues that the Los Angeles mayoral primary produced results he considers implausible and suspicious.
- Greenfield frames the LA mayoral primary as an “impossible” election in which the ballot drops allegedly produced outcomes that defied credibility.
- The article’s central claim is that the election process in Los Angeles allowed political actors to manipulate or “steal” the result as more ballots were counted.
- Greenfield uses the Rodgers and Hammerstein lyric “Impossible things are happ’ning every day” as a sarcastic hook to describe what he says happened during the vote count.
- He argues that the issue is not simply that unlikely outcomes occurred, but that the system has made such outcomes politically possible.
- The piece presents the LA election as part of a broader critique of progressive-controlled election systems and urban political machines.
- Greenfield’s tone is accusatory, describing the situation as one where “nothing is impossible for political criminals.”
- The article appears to be tied to a video commentary rather than a long written investigative report, with only a short written post accompanying it.
Read the full story:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-incredible-impossible-unbelievable-la-mayoral-election-video/

