Drudge Report is not alone as more popular news aggregators turn against President Trump. For the real news and opinions from across the web that Americans need, check out JD Rucker’s curated links.
In this Liberty Nation article, the author examines what a realistic U.S. victory in a war with Iran might look like and why defining victory is far more complicated than simply defeating Iran militarily.
- The United States has overwhelming military superiority over Iran, but the real question is what strategic end state Washington actually wants to achieve.
- President Donald Trump has called for “unconditional surrender” from Iran, raising the possibility of regime change as a potential objective.
- Some lawmakers warn that removing the current regime could drag the United States into another prolonged nation-building effort similar to Iraq or Afghanistan.
- One possible definition of victory would be destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities and severely weakening its missile programs and regional proxy forces.
- Another scenario involves encouraging internal uprising or political collapse of the Islamic Republic without a large American occupation force.
- The article stresses that wars often become open-ended when leaders fail to define the desired outcome early.
- Oil markets, regional stability, and domestic political support in the United States could all shape how long any conflict continues.
- Ultimately, the piece argues that military success alone does not guarantee strategic victory unless the political objective is clear and achievable.
Read the full story:
https://www.libertynation.com/what-does-a-us-victory-in-iran-look-like/
